5 inconvenient facts of Australian advisory firms
30 November 2017
30 November 2017
Terry Bell is the owner of Business Health, where he helps business owners make informed decisions and implement proven solutions.
Terry Bell outlines five strategic issues impacting planning practices and the profession that were identified in Business Health’s latest Future Ready VII report.
Earlier this year, Business Health released the latest white paper in our Future Ready series, Future Ready VII. This report was based on results of the 226 firms that have taken the Business HealthCheck1 over the past two years. This includes a mix of aligned, small/large, regional and ‘better’ practices that have been participants in various licensee ‘premier practitioner’ programs or were entrants in our Best Practice Competition.
Overall, it was pleasing to note the uplift in overall practice profitability. But as we delved deeper into our analysis, it became clear that practices perhaps aren’t on as solid a foundation as they might first appear to be.
The lack of progress in key areas, such as client feedback, communication, client value propositions, business and succession planning, in our opinion, overshadow what might otherwise be considered a very positive ‘health report’.
I don’t propose to discuss here the significant and fundamental changes currently underway within this marketplace. Suffice to say, ‘the times, they are a-changing’… again.
What I would like to spend a few minutes on though, are what we believe to be the strategically important (and inconvenient) issues emerging from our latest analysis.
Most principals remain optimistic about the outlook for their business over the coming 12 months:
You get the drift – Australian advisers are, on the whole, very positive. But (there’s always a ‘but’), there’s a huge difference between words and action.
Each of these statements represent a major initiative, which will require significant management time, focus, expertise and resourcing to be devoted to it, to ensure its achieved. Yet Future Ready VII tells us that only one-in-three (35 per cent) practices have a longer-term strategic plan for their business, and just 38 per cent have an operational business plan covering the upcoming 12 months (and many of these are light on content/detail). These findings are considerably poorer than our previous analysis.
Without a carefully thought out plan to implement, we question whether the above are truly realistic goals or are they simply well-intentioned dreams and hopes.
For advisers to remain ‘relevant’ (and therefore valuable) to their clients, they must continue to not only deliver a service that their clients truly appreciate and are happy to pay for, but they also need to continually reinforce that service.
We are therefore at a loss to explain some of the latest communication findings:
It seems that to describe a practice as ‘client centric’ is a far easier thing to do, than to actually deliver to the description!
Are practices deriving maximum return on the investment they are making in their staff? It’s an interesting question.
As the average practice is employing 5.6 permanent staff, it’s no surprise that the biggest expense for almost all practices is their salaries/wages bill. Assuming a notional $100,000 package for each of the working principals/owners, the average practice is investing to the order of $480,000 per annum in salaries – this accounts for 45 cents of every dollar of revenue generated by the firm. And yet:
It is therefore surprising (at least to me) that more is not being done to maximise the return on this investment.
Somewhat ironically, given the role most advisers play for their clients, very few practices have adequately addressed what will happen if the principal is no longer involved in the business, either by retirement or through a forced exit due to death or disability.
Only 30 per cent of the firms have any form of documented succession plan or buy/sell agreement and a quarter of these do not cover all of the four major trigger events (death, disability, retirement and resignation). Forty-one per cent of the principals with a succession plan have not yet identified a potential successor, let alone agreed to any terms or timeframes.
Two-thirds of these practices are single principal/sole owner businesses, and while it is perhaps not surprising that just 11 per cent of them advised that their business would continue to grow and develop without them (in fact, 56 per cent stated their practice could not operate at all if they were not there), this situation clearly represents a significant business risk. Especially so, given that 63 per cent of the clients who have completed the Business Health CATScan client survey have stated that they “would not be comfortable dealing with anyone else from the practice other than their current adviser”.
This situation is further exacerbated by our finding that 44 per cent of these principals have no key person protection plan in place; 68 per cent have not documented all of their systems and processes; and in 73 per cent of the practices, the adviser alone conducts all of the client reviews.
The risk is clear and without a proper transition plan in place, these practices remain at risk of not optimising the capital value inherent in their practice.
Clients are ageing. When you consider the current state of play for many Australian practices, more focus and attention will be needed over the next few years to successfully address the greying client demographic. Consider:
And yet, we’re informed from our latest analysis, that 67 per cent of business owners won’t be looking to expand their service range over the next 12+ months. While many of today’s clients have moved on from superannuation and protection, I can’t help but wonder if their adviser has.
Is there a risk that clients and their advisers could very well become disengaged or disconnected over the next few years?
So, there you have it – our top five inconvenient facts.
As to what to do about them, well, that ball rests in your court. And while to do nothing may be a valid response for some, it won’t be for most. As Bob Dylan wrote all those years ago, “For the times, they are a-changin”.
5 inconvenient facts of Australian advisory firms30 November 2017 Terry Bell outlines five strategic issues impacting planning practices and the profession that were identified in Business Health’s latest Future Ready VII report. Earlier this year, Business Health released the latest white paper in our Future Ready series, Future Ready VII. This report was based on results of the 226 firms that have taken the Business HealthCheck1 over the past two years. This includes a mix of aligned, small/large, regional and ‘better’ practices that have been participants in various licensee ‘premier practitioner’ programs or were entrants in our Best Practice Competition. Overall, it was pleasing to note the uplift in overall practice profitability. But as we delved deeper into our analysis, it became clear that practices perhaps aren’t on as solid a foundation as they might first appear to be. The lack of progress in key areas, such as client feedback, communication, client value propositions, business and succession planning, in our opinion, overshadow what might otherwise be considered a very positive ‘health report’. I don’t propose to discuss here the significant and fundamental changes currently underway within this marketplace. Suffice to say, ‘the times, they are a-changing’… again. What I would like to spend a few minutes on though, are what we believe to be the strategically important (and inconvenient) issues emerging from our latest analysis. An optimistic outlook: Goals or dreams?Most principals remain optimistic about the outlook for their business over the coming 12 months:
You get the drift – Australian advisers are, on the whole, very positive. But (there’s always a ‘but’), there’s a huge difference between words and action. Each of these statements represent a major initiative, which will require significant management time, focus, expertise and resourcing to be devoted to it, to ensure its achieved. Yet Future Ready VII tells us that only one-in-three (35 per cent) practices have a longer-term strategic plan for their business, and just 38 per cent have an operational business plan covering the upcoming 12 months (and many of these are light on content/detail). These findings are considerably poorer than our previous analysis. Without a carefully thought out plan to implement, we question whether the above are truly realistic goals or are they simply well-intentioned dreams and hopes. Continual reinforcement: Communicate, communicate, communicateFor advisers to remain ‘relevant’ (and therefore valuable) to their clients, they must continue to not only deliver a service that their clients truly appreciate and are happy to pay for, but they also need to continually reinforce that service. We are therefore at a loss to explain some of the latest communication findings:
It seems that to describe a practice as ‘client centric’ is a far easier thing to do, than to actually deliver to the description! Investment in staffAre practices deriving maximum return on the investment they are making in their staff? It’s an interesting question. As the average practice is employing 5.6 permanent staff, it’s no surprise that the biggest expense for almost all practices is their salaries/wages bill. Assuming a notional $100,000 package for each of the working principals/owners, the average practice is investing to the order of $480,000 per annum in salaries – this accounts for 45 cents of every dollar of revenue generated by the firm. And yet:
It is therefore surprising (at least to me) that more is not being done to maximise the return on this investment. What happens if something happens?Somewhat ironically, given the role most advisers play for their clients, very few practices have adequately addressed what will happen if the principal is no longer involved in the business, either by retirement or through a forced exit due to death or disability. Only 30 per cent of the firms have any form of documented succession plan or buy/sell agreement and a quarter of these do not cover all of the four major trigger events (death, disability, retirement and resignation). Forty-one per cent of the principals with a succession plan have not yet identified a potential successor, let alone agreed to any terms or timeframes. Two-thirds of these practices are single principal/sole owner businesses, and while it is perhaps not surprising that just 11 per cent of them advised that their business would continue to grow and develop without them (in fact, 56 per cent stated their practice could not operate at all if they were not there), this situation clearly represents a significant business risk. Especially so, given that 63 per cent of the clients who have completed the Business Health CATScan client survey have stated that they “would not be comfortable dealing with anyone else from the practice other than their current adviser”. This situation is further exacerbated by our finding that 44 per cent of these principals have no key person protection plan in place; 68 per cent have not documented all of their systems and processes; and in 73 per cent of the practices, the adviser alone conducts all of the client reviews. The risk is clear and without a proper transition plan in place, these practices remain at risk of not optimising the capital value inherent in their practice. The disconnect is growingClients are ageing. When you consider the current state of play for many Australian practices, more focus and attention will be needed over the next few years to successfully address the greying client demographic. Consider:
And yet, we’re informed from our latest analysis, that 67 per cent of business owners won’t be looking to expand their service range over the next 12+ months. While many of today’s clients have moved on from superannuation and protection, I can’t help but wonder if their adviser has. Is there a risk that clients and their advisers could very well become disengaged or disconnected over the next few years? SummarySo, there you have it – our top five inconvenient facts. As to what to do about them, well, that ball rests in your court. And while to do nothing may be a valid response for some, it won’t be for most. As Bob Dylan wrote all those years ago, “For the times, they are a-changin”. Footnotes
|
HelpSelect and copy the HTML code above, or
Thank you a copy has been sent to your email. Your e-book will begin automatically. Please click the link below to download manually.
Click here to download